Last year, Slovenia allocated 115 euros per capita for culture, Croatia 109, Montenegro 40, Serbia 18, and Bosnia and Herzegovina 1,3 euros, according to the analysis of the Independent Cultural Scene.
Since 2015, the NKSS has been monitoring the spending of the public budget through the analysis of the results of the competition for culture, and the aforementioned result was obtained by analyzing the use of public funds by the Ministry of Culture, the Provincial Secretariat for Culture, the Secretariat for Culture of the City of Belgrade, the Culture Administration of the City of Novi Sad, and administration for social activities of ten more cities in Serbia (Subotica, Zrenjanin, Kragujevac, Kraljevo, Kruševac, Užice, Novi Pazar, Niš, Leskovac and Vranje).
A clear and worrying trend can be observed in the past decade.
Despite the fact that Serbia's budget is nominally increasing, the percentage earmarked for culture is decreasing.
A high percentage of "phantom" organizations has become a regular practice, and is visible in a high percentage. "Phantom" organizations are those that receive money even though culture is not their primary activity, those that were founded immediately before the competition of the Ministry and the like.
Funds for culture are small, but the bigger problem is that they are squandered on dubious projects, projects of predatory organizations through a fund to which the Minister of Culture and other decision-makers have the discretionary right, is one of the conclusions of the research.
In 2025, the budget for culture will be smaller than it was this year - only 0,67%.
UNESCO recommends the two member states to set aside a minimum of 1% of the state budget for culture. Once again, Serbia did not reach the recommended amount.