In the conclusions, which FoNet had access to, it is also stated that no criminal or misdemeanor proceedings were initiated against all the persons named in the request, nor were the persons named in the student's request relieved of their duties.
As an example, it is stated that neither the attackers of the protesters on Woodrow Wilson Boulevard in Belgrade, nor of Ilija Kostić (74) have been identified and prosecuted.
In connection with the third student demand - dismissal of criminal charges against arrested and detained students at the protests, as well as the suspension of already initiated criminal proceedings, the expert group notes that the wording of the student demand makes it impossible to precisely identify its content in terms of the persons who are the subject of the request and the events covered by the request.
"Even though the proceedings have been suspended in respect of some, perhaps all, of the persons named in the student's request, due to the unavailability of the information requested from the Ministry of Justice and due to the wording of the request itself, it cannot be asserted with certainty that the proceedings have been suspended against all the persons included in the request," reads the summary of the conclusions of the expert group.
Decisions on pardons are selective
It is added that the decisions on pardons are selective, because they made it impossible to conduct proceedings against some students, but not against other persons who participated in the same event and undertook the same actions, as well as because persons who were not included in the request, and whose pardon is contrary to the spirit of the student requests, were also pardoned.
Decisions on pardons are selective also because the pardon prevented the establishment of all disputed facts, possible illegalities in the work of the police and illegality in the actions of the public prosecutor's office and the court when ordering custody and starting investigations, the report states.
