Today, life is increasingly presented as a project that needs to be put in order, that needs to be stabilized, optimized, normalized, balanced, and extended. Functionality is expected from the body, consistency from the subject, clear meaning from the biography. Everything that escapes that picture quickly translates into a problem - both health and psychological and professional. It is precisely in those places, where life slips away from us, that it reveals itself to us the most.
Life appears as a text in the process of creation. It develops through stops, stutters, mistakes and revisions, in a rhythm that is not always subject to control. Its truth depends on the degree of openness, not on the compulsion of coherence. That is why changes, weaknesses and inconsistencies are an integral part of living, not its deviation. Rigidity and immutability, excess structure, belong to norms and systems that strive for stability, while life remains tied to the possibility of flexibility, adaptation and movement.
Body unrest
The textuality of life is a political condition. What can be written down can be challenged; what remains open cannot be fully captured by management. Modern orders therefore strive to make life legible, namely they need a body without pauses, an identity without cracks, a biography without contradictions. Such legibility facilitates control, but narrows the space of actual movement.
Life is recognized by restlessness. A restless body does not maintain a stable position, it lags, stops, stumbles and gets tired sometimes without a clear reason, in other words it moves when it is expected to be calm. This restlessness often translates into an individual problem, although it clearly shows the limits of the rhythms imposed by work, productivity and self-control. Restlessness exposes the tension between living and demands that life be constantly adjusted.
At the same time, life is structured by dependence. The body is referred to sleep, time, infrastructure and other people, other bodies. Moods and falls often arise from internal material dynamics that are not subject to plans or decisions that cannot be completely explained or ignored.
Defense of weakness
In a culture of autonomy, dependency is often interpreted as weakness or disorder. This obscures the basic fact that life takes place in relationships that are never completely subject to the will. The idea of a self-sufficient subject functions as a norm that disciplines deviance, while the actual experience of the body constantly shows how fragile that norm is. The body therefore disrupts any pure version of the subject. His reactions are often slower, more intense or quieter than expected. Weakness in this sense does not mean a lack of capacity, but the presence of a reality that cannot be reduced to mere functionality. Pause, hesitation, stuttering, stumbling and passivity become places where the illusion of uninterrupted flow is interrupted.
When politics is reduced solely to the proofreading of life - to correction, normalization and stabilization - it turns into a management technique. Instead of understanding, correction is at play; instead of a common world, we have a standard of acceptability. Restlessness, dependency and instability then appear as problems and obstacles to be removed, not as facts that require a different approach, a different political response.
That is why we need a policy that does not remain at the level of the final editorial. Its role is not to lock life into stable patterns, but to enable the coexistence of different rhythms, states and relationships. Restlessness and addiction then cease to be private burdens and become politically relevant signals that life remains open, exposed and unfinished. It is precisely in this incompleteness that there is room for a politics that does not govern life, but remains with it in a tense mutual dynamic and rhythm of constant change.
Big holiday discount on "Vreme" - subscriptions 25 percent cheaper until mid-January. Give it away subscription to yourself or to someone else, read what matters.