If we consume twice as much energy as the member states of the European Union, can we pay for it? The answer is negative.
In Serbia, over a million households live in energy poverty, which by definition means that they live in a state in which the household does not have the ability to provide the amount of energy necessary for a healthy and dignified life in a way that does not endanger other basic life needs of the household or the wider community .
Namely, energy transition measures are necessary in order to save energy inside the building, and this further requires certain investments and an economic standard that the citizens of Serbia generally do not have.
This is one of the conclusions of the Analysis of the Effects of Energy Efficiency Measures on Housing Affordability, a publication of the Ministry of Space, which was presented today. Its author is Nikola Vujković, an expert in energy efficiency.
The state must become much more involved
Analyzes of the housing stock show that as many as 85 percent of buildings in Serbia do not meet minimum energy efficiency standards. Also, the building sector is a large consumer of energy everywhere in the world. In Europe, they consume 40 percent of the total energy, while in Serbia that number reaches as much as 60 percent. Average energy consumption for heating in European countries is about 70 kWh/m2 per year. In contrast, in Serbia, the average consumption is almost twice as high, reaching around 150 kWh/m2 per year, according to the Analysis.
The implementation of energy efficiency measures can be harsh towards those citizens who are of a worse economic status, and there are many of them in Serbia.
In order for this not to happen, it is crucial for the state to be actively involved in increasing the energy efficiency of buildings, but more importantly, family housing facilities, so that these measures include those who need them the most, writes the Analysis.
The measures currently implemented by the state hardly touch this layer of society, that is, they refer to the reduction of bills for electricity, district heating and gas, which does not represent a significant help, because this type of household is mostly heated with wood or coal.
The measures that would initially help would be the replacement of individual fire pits with more efficient ones, subsidies for firewood and larger subsidies for the replacement of carpentry, insulation and installations, according to the Analysis.
The result of these measures would be lower electricity bills, lower housing costs and more opportunities for a quality life for a larger number of citizens.
The rich and the poor
It would not be good if only the wealthier stratum of society passed through the energy transition, while the poor remained with large bills and cold, unlit houses, trapped in a spiral of poverty.
"The energy transition will be successful only if no one is left out of it, otherwise, there will be no reduction in pollution, nor the necessary reduction in the emission of particles harmful to public health, and the gap in society will significantly deepen", says the introduction of the Analysis.